There have often been discussions lately as to the feasibility of the size of a Groove workspace. This has as much to do behind the
purpose of the Groove in the first place. In my opinion Groove was
really designed for
groups up to say 25 or so. But
most collaboraiton is among
groups of 5-15. But Groove can entertain much larger
numbers. The trick is
to make
collaboration effective and many people will argue this till blue in the face.
Based on
some of the
workspaces I have worked with, Groove is on average comprised of groups in the 45 range and
some are over 150 in size (
developer group).
Keep in mind you are
only storing data that is part of the
workspace not the data of 150 users. That said it
came back to the
collaboration being
done and Groove has some minor issues with calendaring and notifications which
just don't do well unless you use
some amazingly clean and handy tools from
Hommes and Process. Then Grove takes a big leap forward.
Hommes and Process put back
what was sorely missing from Groove when it became part of Office 2007.
Now things like dropping docs form anywhere into Groove (
and precisely to the workspace you
want is as easy and saving in Office) and emails can also be dropped to Grove
workspaces with the flick of a mouse click. Do check
http://www.hommesetprocess.com/enBut back to the size issue.
I think you have to decide what it is you are trying to
disseminate as information to a specific set of people in Groove and if you need to repeat specific messages but with
different groups, how much
versioning one does, if the
information might be more of a dictation
rather than a forum for discussion. And finally is there a need for people to be up to date on the data in a workspace?
Its not cut and dry and at a certian point (250 users) Groove should not be used as a solution but rather Sharepoint.
More on this again with a user group we'll talk about later.